web 2.0

Google’s Personalized Search

google

Oh Google, we love you so but why do you have to keep stirring the pot? Oh yes, because it is your job, I forgot.

Last month Google rolled out their ‘personalized search’ for everyone. This isn’t new technology. It has previously been available to only those folks who were signed into their Google account. Now, we all get to have it, whether we want it or not.

A short explanation of ‘personalized search’ comes from Google’s blog:

‘Now when you search using Google, we will be able to better provide you with the most relevant results possible. For example, since I always search for [recipes] and often click on results from epicurious.com, Google might rank epicurious.com higher on the results page the next time I look for recipes. Other times, when I’m looking for news about Cornell University’s sports teams, I search for [big red]. Because I frequently click on www.cornellbigred.com, Google might show me this result first, instead of the Big Red soda company or others.’

The long and short of it is now when I put ‘get hamster out of wall’ in the search box on my computer I will probably get a different list of sites than when you enter it on your computer.

This provides a whole host of perplexing problems for search engine optimizers starting with, oh, say keywords. Back in the old days (you know – the days of 2009) the search engines analyzed the words on a web page, then they psychoanalyzed each and every other component and Viola! a page rank is born.

Well, that was then and this is now. And this ‘now’ has your search history prominently filtered into your very own, private search results. (It’s just between you and Google and a few hundred million advertisers.)

So what is a site optimizer or owner to do?

Start with the two things that will always (probably) help with your search ranking

  1. Update you site often with great content your audience will want to read
  2. Get lots and lots of links from RELEVANT sites.
  3. Keep an eye on your analytics.

Who’s Tweeting at Twitter.com?

Here is a partial list – its kind of impressive:

Reuters http://twitter.com/reuters
BBC (Off-site List) http://menti.net/?p=1
CNN http://twitter.com/cnnbrk
NY Times http://twitter.com/nytimes (The NYT also offers other sections in twitter)
NY Times Business http://twitter.com/nytimesbusiness
MSNBC http://twitter.com/dcagle
Today Show http://twitter.com/TodayShow
Wired News http://twitter.com/wired
NPR http://twitter.com/nprnews
Science Friday http://twitter.com/scifri
Planet Money http://twitter.com/planetmoney
ZDNet http://twitter.com/zdnett
Conde Nast Portfolio http://twitter.com/Portfolio
Continue reading »

Who's Tweeting at Twitter.com?

Here is a partial list – its kind of impressive:

Reuters http://twitter.com/reuters
BBC (Off-site List) http://menti.net/?p=1
CNN http://twitter.com/cnnbrk
NY Times http://twitter.com/nytimes (The NYT also offers other sections in twitter)
NY Times Business http://twitter.com/nytimesbusiness
MSNBC http://twitter.com/dcagle
Today Show http://twitter.com/TodayShow
Wired News http://twitter.com/wired
NPR http://twitter.com/nprnews
Science Friday http://twitter.com/scifri
Planet Money http://twitter.com/planetmoney
ZDNet http://twitter.com/zdnett
Conde Nast Portfolio http://twitter.com/Portfolio
Continue reading »

Photo What?

photoshop

When I was 10 my dad got this really cool program for his computer. I think it was called Photoshop. He showed me how to use a couple of the tools, I remember specifically the “smudgy finger tool” was of particular interest. I played with it for a while and made (drew) a picture of a candle. I remember thinking the program was incredibly cool but didn’t know at the time how much of my future I would spend using it.

18 years have passed since that fateful day in Ohio, and I have grown with each upgrade of Adobe. I was there when they gave layers, history, clipping masks, filters, and vectors. Heck, I even remember the “big electric cat”.

Continue reading »

Just say no to Internet Explorer

ethunk

… I’ve been pulling my hair out this past week because of my dear friend Internet Explorer. Now, I could sit here and type on and on about why Explorer sucks and why you shouldn’t use it, but quite honestly I don’t want to and a quick trip to Google would provide you with more than enough reason to make the switch.

What baffles me though it the objection we get when we suggest this change. Maybe it’s because people don’t like change or they are afraid they won’t understand the upgrade to a cleaner, faster,  superior browser that has sweet bells and whistles, I don’t know.

Here’s my point, I’ve put a lot of links in here for Firefox and i’m not even nessicarly telling you you should use Firefox, but for Pete’s sake (we must always look out for Pete) if you are still using IE 6 or less, it’s is imperative that you upgrade.

I will leave you with this analogy:
If you were using a brand of oil but went to a mechanic and he said, “You know you should really use this oil because that oil is going to destroy your car.” Wouldn’t you at least give it a thought?